Types of Scientific Journals: Open Access, Subscription, and Hybrid Models

Scientific journals don't all operate by the same rules — and those rules matter enormously for who gets to read the research, who pays for it, and what happens after publication. This page breaks down the three dominant publishing models — open access, subscription, and hybrid — explaining how each works, where they're typically encountered, and how researchers, institutions, and funders navigate the choice between them.

Definition and scope

A scientific journal's business model determines the mechanism by which it recovers the cost of peer review administration, copyediting, typesetting, and digital distribution. Three models dominate the landscape:

Subscription journals charge libraries or individual readers for access. The research is published at no direct cost to the author, but readers — or more precisely, their institutions — pay annual subscription fees to unlock the content. Elsevier, Springer Nature, and Wiley-Blackwell are among the largest publishers operating substantial subscription portfolios.

Open access (OA) journals make all published content freely available to any reader with an internet connection. The cost recovery shifts to the author side, typically through Article Processing Charges (APCs), which can range from a few hundred dollars to over $11,000 for high-prestige titles (PLOS ONE's APC, for reference, is $1,595 as of the fee schedule published by PLOS). Gold open access means the final published version is immediately and permanently free. Diamond open access is a rarer model — no charges to authors or readers, typically subsidized by institutions or consortia.

Hybrid journals are subscription titles that offer individual articles as open access if the author (or their funder) pays an APC. The journal continues collecting subscriptions while also collecting APCs — a dual revenue structure that critics call "double dipping," as documented in analyses by the Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition (SPARC).

The scope of these models intersects with institutional policy, funder mandates, and copyright licensing frameworks like Creative Commons. For a grounding reference on how all three fit into the broader publishing ecosystem, the home reference on scientific journals provides useful orientation.

How it works

The machinery differs most sharply at two points: payment timing and access rights.

In a subscription journal, the author submits, peer review proceeds, and upon acceptance the publisher owns or exclusively licenses the final article. The journal's revenue comes from library subscriptions — contracts that US research universities often pay in multi-journal "big deal" bundles, which can run into millions of dollars per institution annually. When a library cancels a subscription, access to the back catalog may be lost entirely.

In a gold open access journal, the author — or their institution or funder — pays an APC before or at the point of acceptance. Once paid, the article is published under a license (usually Creative Commons Attribution, or CC BY) that permits anyone to read, download, and reuse the work with attribution. The article processing charges explained page covers APC structures in detail.

Hybrid journals layer both mechanisms. A library pays for journal-wide subscription access. Simultaneously, an author whose funder requires open access pays an APC to "unlock" their specific article. This means the publisher is paid twice for related content in the same issue — a practice that led some funders, notably in Europe, to move away from supporting hybrid APCs except under formal "transformative agreements" that credit subscription fees against OA costs.

Common scenarios

Understanding where each model typically appears helps explain why researchers encounter all three regularly:

  1. NIH-funded research — The NIH Public Access Policy requires that refereed manuscripts resulting from NIH funding be deposited in PubMed Central and made publicly available within 12 months of publication. As of 2023, this was tightened: all NIH-funded research must be made freely available immediately upon publication under the updated policy announced by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP memo, August 2022).

  2. Clinical medicine — Journals like The Lancet and NEJM operate primarily on subscription models, though both offer hybrid OA options. The prestige economy in clinical publishing remains heavily tied to subscription journals, even as funder pressure mounts.

  3. Physics and mathematics — These fields normalized preprint culture decades before biology did. arXiv, launched in 1991, now hosts over 2 million preprints, meaning the actual refereed journal version is sometimes secondary to the preprint in terms of how the work circulates. The preprint servers vs refereed journals page explores this dynamic.

  4. European research councils — Plan S, the initiative by cOAlition S (a group of European national funding agencies), requires that research funded by participating agencies be published in compliant open access venues. This has materially shifted APC negotiation toward transformative agreements rather than traditional hybrid payments.

Decision boundaries

Choosing a publishing model isn't purely philosophical — it involves concrete constraints:

The federal open access mandate in the US and the open access publishing in science pages offer extended treatment of the policy environment shaping these decisions.

References

Read Next

Article Processing Charges (APCs): What Authors Need to Know They have become one of the most financially consequential decisions in modern research dissemination, reshaping how science... Preprint Servers vs. Peer-Reviewed Journals: Key Differences Peer-Reviewed Journals: Key Differences Preprint servers and peer-reviewed journals both publish scientific work, but they do... Journal Indexing Databases: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and DOAJ Getting it found is another problem entirely — and that's where indexing databases do the heavy lifting.